|
Post by schnautzr on Nov 25, 2009 1:48:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by schnautzr on Nov 25, 2009 3:36:01 GMT
|
|
hermes888
Researcher
Pterafrax the Quetzalcoatlus [F4:Hermes888]
Posts: 188
|
Post by hermes888 on Nov 25, 2009 12:08:40 GMT
Ugh... making atheists look bad... calling Darwin racist... I hate these guys...
|
|
|
Post by schnautzr on Nov 26, 2009 2:55:52 GMT
Yeah...the Post Bulletin sure wasn't playing favorites yesterday...looks like I can expect to receive my own free copy of this controversial edition, according to the second article.
|
|
hermes888
Researcher
Pterafrax the Quetzalcoatlus [F4:Hermes888]
Posts: 188
|
Post by hermes888 on Nov 26, 2009 3:09:21 GMT
Darwin wasn't racist or sexist. Those are just made up! No biologist would think that women are "less evolved". And they were anti-slavery too! Darwin did not intend Social Darwinism or Nazism. Assuming that is just plain stupid if I can say so myself. I don't see why they criticized Dawkin's comment. It wasn't some paradox, he was referring to Social Darwinism, not Darwinism itself! They make atheists sound like total fools, which annoys me.
|
|
|
Post by schnautzr on Nov 27, 2009 1:31:31 GMT
Ha, I would challenge Reverend Comfort to actually study paleontology and still stand up against Darwin.
|
|